In three weeks, the Supreme Court
will entertain arguments over President Obama's health care law. At the
heart of the entire law is the individual mandate, which requires every
American to have health insurance coverage or pay a penalty.
Though Justice Anthony Kennedy
is often viewed as the swing vote on the current court, the
administration isn't counting out the possibility it could win its case
by persuading one of the so-called conservatives.
In its briefs, the administration has frequently quoted from a 2005 opinion written by Justice Antonin Scalia.
In that case, Scalia wrote that Congress may use its authority under
the Commerce Clause -- pertaining to interstate commerce -- to regulate
an individual who wanted to grow medicinal marijuana at home and then
sell it.
The Commerce Clause is, of course, the basis for the government's position that the individual mandate is constitutional.
Elizabeth Wydra, chief counsel for the
Constitutional Accountability Center, says Scalia's own words make a
powerful argument in favor of the mandate.
"Even if Scalia is skeptical of the merits of the health care reform law, it will be very hard for him to get away from his own writings on this issue that do support the government."
But many doubters remain. Attorney Tom
Dupree, former principal deputy assistant attorney general, is
unconvinced that any of the court's more conservative justices will be
easily swayed.
"No matter how the administration tries to
characterize this, at the end of the day, you're talking about one of
the most sweeping expansions of federal power in our history - and
that's something they've got to try to defend (against)," Dupree said.
The Supreme Court will not only consider the
individual mandate, but also whether the rest of the law can survive if
the mandate is struck down. It also will examine state objections to
the expansion of Medicaid under the health care law. The arguments are scheduled for March 26 to 28.
No comments:
Post a Comment